< Previouslove for God and for neighbour, better than a thousand discourses or a thou- sand “works” of charity; they were living testimony to love for Christ who re- ally continued to exist in their lives and showed to the world that they felt proud to be what they were. Likewise they abolished the obligation established by Saint Paul for women to cover their heads inside church, deeming it of “no importance” to reject the instructions and teachings of the Apostles. The changes in the Mass began in middle of the 1960’s. They were drafted by vatican freemasonry using the Sacred Congregation of Rites. These changes were sent out to all the archdioceses in the world in a publication as compre- hensive as it was expensive, and from there to all the parishes in the world. Every week, or almost every week, these ‘changes from Rome’ appeared. The first of these changes, what a coincidence! was to remove the prayer to Saint Michael which the Priest recited at the foot of the Altar after Mass. After a couple of years, the ‘mass’ had become unrecognizable as mass and ambiguous as sacrifice, lead- ing up to the complete abolition of the true Mass in November 1969, when the Unbloody Holy Sacrifice in which Calvary is truly perpetuated and the Divine Blood is out- poured for mankind’s Redemption was supplanted by the heretical “novus ordo missæ”, which is a banquet or supper, and therefore pseudo-mass. Holy Mass had to be the centre of the plan. They did not attempt to remove it in one fell swoop, because that would have been impossible, but they had a very particular strategy of attack, synthesized in the following points: The whole attack consisted in removing its sacred significance as the unbloody renovation of the Sacrifice of the Cross, and re- ducing it to no more than a fraternal banquet. The plan said: Christians say that the Mass is a banquet, which therefore we insist on, that it is only that, a banquet of brethren. To do so they proposed many details; each of them, they said, would seem to take nothing away from the Mass, but all put to- gether would turn it into a banquet among “brethren”; and when the Sacrifice of Calvary were to disappear from Holy Mass, brotherhood would disappear as well, as a mast falls when its support is removed. First of all, simple things, and which seem reason-able: to say Mass in the people’s own language, so as to understand each other better at the banquet. By that, the plan said, they would succeed in removing something of the sacred mystery of the Mass. Mass facing the people, and the Priest looking at the congregation. This would be easy to accept, the plan said, for the Priest cannot be turning his back on his parishioners! By such a simple ruse, the plan sought to achieve important things. Firstly that God not be the Centre of the Mass, but men; that the Priest not be looking at God but at men. Previ- ously, the Priest did not turn his back on the Christians, but faced God, as did all Christians: someone seated on the second bench does not turn his back on someone on the third bench, but faces God. An essential requisite for saying Holy Mass was always that the Altar have a Crucifix. But with the Priest now facing the public, the Crucifix faces the Priest, but has its back to the Christians, so that the Crucifix on the Altar is superfluous. On the Altar there were always Saints’ relics, but now only a simple table made of wood, or whatever! because it had been turned into a banquet. The ploy was to remove from Holy Mass ev- erything that smelt of “sacred”. Insist on being natural, the masonic plan said. Do away with genuflec- tions, and let each Priest use what- ever words come to him, and make the movements he likes best, pro- vided that he make genuflections at the Consecration; all the rest is su- perfluous, he should do things his own way. And continue to use thumbs and index fingers for other things after having consecrated with them. The idea was gradually to re- move all that was mysterious and sa- cred. Let there be readings, and so ap- pear more like a protestant service, the plan said; the idea was to mini- mize the Sacrifice of Calvary as far as possible, and that it be not central. Let there be much talk, much singing, that the brethren greet each other, beg forgiveness… insist on every-thing which can make them forget God, adoration of God… Let them adore man! It is to be noted that the plan was utterly diabolical, based on good things, but with the objective of doing away with adoration of God, forgetting Christ’s Sacrifice… and with the foundations destroyed, “the mast of brotherhood would fall”. The Tabernacle is now a problem, as with the Priest facing the public, he has his back to the Tabernacle. Therefore it would be better to re- move the Tabernacle from the centre of the Church and place it to one side, and thus the Priest would not have his back to it during Mass. By this, the plan says, we shall remove the Tabernacles from the centre of the Church. That will be a great step… ! Little by little insist on the banquet business, to leave out Christ and gather the “brethren” in confrater- nity. In brief it will be a gathering of brethren, but without adoration of God, without thanksgiving to God. A banquet of “brethren” will be achieved, but Christ’s Sacrifice will be forgotten. Insist on love for protestant “brethren”, and that Mass appear as close as possible to protes- tant services, thus the better to at- tract the “separated brethren” to the Catholic Church, the masonic plan ironically said. Communion standing and in the hand! The whole purpose of the plan was to eliminate in man the love of God, for the plan reasons that if in the end no one loves God, no one will love neighbour; love of neighbour cannot exist without a reason, love of neighbour is impossible without love of God. The Eucharist is central to Catholicism, the plan says, for it is nothing less than Christ God become Bread for love of men! It cannot be eliminated in one go, because no Catholic would accept that; but it proposes a satanically refined strat- egy of attack: first of all, eliminate as far as possible every sacred aspect of the Eucharist; that people no longer kneel to receive Communion, for ex- ample, insisting that it is a meal and must be taken in a normal way. To re- ceive Communion in the hand would also help to eliminate that mysterious, divine, sacred quality… it is a meal…, without mysteries, without anything that speaks of holiness, but natural, to be eaten, masticated… to be done like Christ’s Last Supper. This first part is so well planned as to convince anyone: insist on doing as Christ did… take it in a natural way… it convinces the best… but the purpose is to try to eliminate that sa- cred, mysterious quality, eliminate the importance of the Eucharist! The most important point of this part of the plan, and it is the second point, is to achieve that Christ God no longer be the centre of the Eu- charist, rather to insist that the Eu- charist is a supper of confraternity, a banquet for the communion of Chris- tians, at which they gather to love each other. This second part is the es- sential one, to change the meaning of the Eucharist, the plan repeatedly in- sists, and indicates how easy it is to achieve: insist on the element of brotherhood, of communion, of the gathering of brethren… and goes on ironically to say: “Let the “brethren” gather and “love each other”! As soon as the sacred fails them, those “brethren” will end up disagreeing with each other, and finally quarrel “fraternally”. To achieve this essential objective, the plan proposed many ideas to help eliminate the “sacred” quality of the Eucharist, such as doing away with exposition of the Blessed Sacrament as it does not include any “banquet” of “brethren”. It proposes Masses and Communion in private houses, so as thus to do away with the “sacred” quality of the Church, of the Eu- charist; it will not be done away with in one go, says the plan, but it all helps to go about eliminating the “sa- cred” quality of the Eucharist and turn it into a mere fraternal gather- ing. It thus proposes not to use the Communion plate to distribute Holy Communion because, it explains, it must be said that, if particles of the Host fall, it does not matter; God, all in all, is everywhere. The plan was ut- ter diabolical wickedness, proposing things which seemed reasonable, but which in short were nothing other than monstrous lies dressed up as truths. Away with the Virgin and the Saints! This was one of the first steps of the “masterplan”: insist that only God should be adored, not the Virgin or the Saints. The plan was very sub- tle in this. It says that Catholics with understanding know very well that the Catholic Church adores God alone, and that she venerates the Saints as friends of God, without adoring them. Thus it would be quite easy to have simple people think that the Catholic Church adores the Saints, that it has them on their Al- tars, and that is a very bad thing; since adoration is owed to God alone. As for the Saints, the plan readily proved successful in many places. In the majority of churches there were no longer saints on the Altars; in each place they gave a different reason, but the fact was that the Saints disap- peared from many Churches. As for the Most Holy Virgin, in the ecumenical conciliabulum the plan had a thousand arguments for de- throning Her: in order to approach closer to protestant “brethren”, Catholics should not insist on the Vir- gin’s pre-eminence, not insist that She is Mother of God; it is sufficient to adore Christ, the rest is superflu- ous… It seemed that for the first time in the history of the Church, the Most Holy Virgin was to be de- throned from Her privileged place in the liturgy and in Christendom… but Pope Paul VI, in person!, came and named Her “Mother of the Church”. The plan continued to work on this matter, considering it essential to de- throne the Virgin in order to destroy the Church. It suggested not praying the Rosary, as this keeps protestant “brethren” away; that there be no Novenas to the Virgin, because that is for “beatos”. Freemasonry suc- ceeded in having the people honour Her solely with their lips, but their hearts were far from the Most Holy Virgin, for the people continued call- ing Mary “full of grace”, “blessed amongst women”, “Mother of God and Our Mother”, but in practice they showed little interest in venerat- ing Her, for they ceased to imitate Her modesty, Her humility, Her pu- rity and Her other virtues. The plan was diabolical. It is said that there were many thousands of catholic priests who were not really Catholic but communists falsely or- dained priests. Yet it was not they who really carried out the plan, but the ones who propagated it. Those who carried out the plan were the sin- cere Catholics who allowed themselves to be duped; the true Bishops, Priests and Nuns, who let themselves be duped by the catch phrase “love of neighbour”. The Catholic faithful were used by freemasonry to carry out their ob- jectives; they duped them with half- truths which were the worst false- hoods so that they might introduce love of neighbour into the world without love of God. They used them to supplant God by man; so that man be adored and God be for- gotten; so that woman be loved and the Virgin be forgotten. All in the hope that without love for God, love for neighbour would be de- stroyed and the Church of Christ would disappear. They deceived with the falsehood that a man can be a freemason and a Catholic at the same time; that he can be a spiritualist and a Catholic at the same time. Christ already forewarned us that the children of darkness are more astute than the children of light. And so the chil- dren of light, having abandoned prayer and the faithful fulfilment of God’s Law, let themselves be taken in by the children of darkness. The antichurch or synagogue of Satan, called in time freemasonry, was founded in the time of Christ; it sought to disparage His teachings to the point of putting Him to Death, so that He might not be held as the true Messias; following Christ’s Death, it decreed perpetual persecution against the true Church. Jewish sectarians, having consummated their apostasy by their abominable deicide, went on to become the most ferocious of Holy Mother Church’s enemies, and promoters of the chief heresies and disorders in the world. Uncon- verted jews are the foundations and pillars of freemasonry, which is the mother of every revolution against Christ and His Church and of all the persecutions she has suffered throughout history. They have ever fought against Holy Mother Church by using all the perverse means at their disposal, especially by lies, calumnies and murders, as is clearly shown in their activities against the Apostles and first Chris- tians. Down through the centuries, sionists have sagaciously infiltrated Catholic clergy, governments and peoples for the purpose of destroy- ing from within the Church which Christ founded, as is clearly shown, not only in some New Testament texts, but as well in historical events themselves, as also in ecclesiastical and civil documents, and most espe- cially in the archives of the Holy In- quisition, institute well deserving of praise for its centuries-long struggle against such infiltration. The slaughter carried out in the revolu- tions promoted by sionism, such as the communists’, have poured out veritable torrents of inno- cent blood with utmost cruelty and impiety; and the horrifying crimes committed by accursed despotic capitalism, another fruit of sionism, are likewise no- table. Sionists, in the course of history, have succeeded in supplant- ing the Catholic Faith for materialism in many nations, reducing them to slavery by oppression, and at the same time taking possession of their wealth. Sionists today are those who direct the governments of the world, with the goal of forming a single uni- versal government. What is so strange regarding freemasonry is that so many members of society be pre- pared to join this diabolical body and become servants of the devil, thereby betraying God, their country, their family, their own soul and everything authentic and noble, in exchange for what? the ruin of others and their own ruin. There have certainly been many traditionalists who denounced today’s rampant heresies and desecrations, and wrote learned articles unmasking the heretical innovations in the novus ordo mass. However, many of those traditionalists put the blame on Pope Saint Paul VI and even came to de- clare him a heretic. Some of them sep- arated from the Pope, refusing to be guided by the Apparitions of Most Holy Mary. Seeing the Church thus destroying herself, the Most Holy Virgin Mary could not remain indifferent, but made ready to crush the head of the ancient serpent of hell, and fulfil God’s promise in Genesis.The Apparitions of El Palmar de Troya n the 30 th of March in the year 1968, the Most Holy Virgin Mary ap- peared to four girls in the Sacred Place of El Palmar de Troya, Utrera, Seville, Spain, on a Lentisco tree, a spot today inside the Palmarian Cathe- dral-Basilica, where the Holy Face of Our Lord Jesus Christ and the Image of Our Crowned Mother of Palmar are venerated. After the first four girls, other seersarose. On the 30 th of September 1969, Clemente Domínguez y Gómez had his first vision. He became the principal messenger, as Our Lord Jesus Christ and the Most Holy Virgin Mary entrusted him with the most transcendent and jeopardizing messages. The Apocalyptic Messages of El Palmar de Troya, given to Clemente Domínguez, consisted in: a continuous call to prayer and penance, an anguished invitation from Heaven for people to come to El Palmar, a denuncia- Es María Divina Doctora, ¡Oh María, tu nombre resuena! Y la tierra, al oírlo, se llena de esperanza, de júbilo y paz.Next >