< PreviousSover- eign Pon- tiffs from Clement XII in 1738 up till to- day. The Popes have pronounced pain of ex- communica- tion against members of the secret societies and against all those who favour them. The true pur- pose of freema- sonry or masonry is to destroy the Religion of Jesus Christ, the Catholic Church, so as to set up free- thinking everywhere, together with independent morals, pure naturalism in the family and in society, which freemasonry calls freedom, equality, fraternity and a new world order. The chief weaponry used by freemasonry to harm the Church has been moral corruption, so that bad books have been multiplied, likewise obscene films, television and other media, in order to saturate people with libertinage and vice. By false- hood, the evil press corrupts the spirit and ruins the heart. Under the cloak of science, it attacks the Church’s teachings without cease, either by denying them or by treating them as ridicu- lous. Thus it goes about destroying the whole edifice of the Catholic Faith piece by piece, hoping to achieve the death of Chris- tianity; so that freemasonry has in fact perpetrated: Reli- gious ruin, loss of Faith and supernatural life in millions of souls; moral ruin, as consequence of growing irreligion, through the polluting action of the lodges, by their filthy press, by masonic laws, by lay schools. The sect’s tactic is to worm its way into every society, pervert its spirit and turn it into an instrument of their plans. As their principal objective is to destroy the Catholic Church, it has specialized in worming its way into the Church’s hierarchy in order thus to ruin it.The “masterplan” to destroy Holy Church reemasonry’s first step was to introduce its own members into the bosom of Holy Church so as to undermine her from within. They re- ally succeeded in having thou- sands of freemasons, commu- nists and jews ordained as ro- man catholic priests and then take charge of parishes, episco- pal secretariats, whole dioceses, and reach the episcopate. Some even succeeded in being ap- pointed cardinals. Once the Catholic Church had been un- dermined by this horde of masked enemies within, the foundation was laid for carrying out one of the most diabolic plans, incredibly cunning and daring, which freemasons called “the masterplan”. It was a long- term plan, costing many years of intense work, and was in- credibly successful: it succeeded in ruining the Roman Catholic Church, then still the true Church, the Church of God. The infiltrated enemies sowed a false piety which drew Catholics and protestants to- gether in a false sentiment of charity, so as to infect the good apples with ones already full of rot. What have they achieved? The loss of the notion of sin, a materialized world, without faith, without hope, without love for God, a world with its back to its God and Creator, and which refuses to serve Him. That rigorous plan to destroy Christ’s Church was a master- piece for shattering the Catholic Church from the foundations up. Many sounded the alarm, but good Christians failed to open their eyes in time. It is surely true that, in past centuries, enemies have infil- trated the Church and caused harm. However, thanks to the watchfulness of holy bishops, they were overcome. But in the twentieth century, as the Most Holy Virgin Mary warned in La Salette, “the heads, the guides of God’s people, have neglected prayer and penance, and the devil has darkened their minds: they have become wandering stars whom the devil draws down with his tail and causes to perish.” With the active or pas- sive cooperation of a negligent hierarchy and before the eyes of a degenerate and indifferent Chris- tian people, the freemasons who had infiltrated the Church could do as they pleased, and go unpunished. The Vatican II Council was con- voked by Pope Saint John XXIII in the face of the terrible events an- nounced in the Secret of Fatima and as well because the North American FBI director, J. Edgar Hoover, warned the Pope that there were communist agents infiltrated into the Catholic clergy by tens of thousands throughout the world. The Pope, taken aback by the Fatima Message, felt the inspiration of the Holy Ghost to convoke the Council and hoped thus to expose and remedy the evils. Though the Council was convoked by Pope Saint John XXIII inspired by the Holy Ghost, shortly after- wards its positive objectives became vitiated under the oppressive influ- ence of a large proportion of freema- son and progressivist council fathers, and because of the cowardice and hu- man respect of no few traditionalists, and it reached openly erroneous and ambiguous conclusions; thus show- ing that the Holy Ghost had been ex- pelled from the Council hall to make way for Satan. That is why vatican council II, with respect to its progress and conclu- sions reached is not the work of the Holy Ghost, but of the devil. Though in the council acts there is a certain amount of sound teaching, it is all mixed up with frightful heresies and ambiguities; since by camouflaging evil in this way, freemasonry made it easier for the council texts to be ac- cepted, and was thus able to achieve its perverse objectives more readily. Vatican council II, in its writings, by the heresy, ambiguity and perverse objectives to which it was led by freemasons and progressivists, is un-lawful, ruinous and abominable, and hence has been declared a con- ciliabulum, void of all authority in the Church. Bear in mind that should there be one single doctrinal error in the Church, then that Church ceases to be the true one. By what has been said we in no way tarnish the illus- trious and infallible authority or good faith of Popes Saint John XXIII and Saint Paul VI, who ruled the Church at the time of this conciliabulum; since, as for the first Pontiff, John XXIII, his enemies took advantage of his excessive pa- ternity, kindness and optimism in- stead of availing themselves of him for their conversions; and as for the second, Paul VI, we know that he was the victim of Vatican freema- sonry, which subjected him to fre- quent brainwashing by way of drugs, and succeeded in getting the Pope’s irreproachable hand to sign at times improperly, though in the majority of cases they falsified his signature. The few pages in vatican II documents which contain au- thentic traditional doctrine are un- doubtedly the work of some few valiant council fathers. The Holy, Great and Dogmatic First Palmar- ian Council declared vatican coun- cil II null and void, and deleted it from the list of the Church’s Holy Councils, as it is to be counted among the conciliabulums. Infiltrated enemies took the lead in all the changes in the liturgy and tradition. Under the pretext of do- ing away with antiquated customs and updating the Church, they sought to modernize her so as to draw in the “separated brethren”. They worked away at substituting the Catholic Church for a suppos- edly universal church with all churches united together, in which jews, muslims, hindus and so on would all be included. The first and sole commandment of this “Univer-sal Church” would be: “to love your neighbour as yourself”. A God of all goodness would continue to exist, but a God who is so good that He does not punish; and as He cannot punish, everyone would soon forget Him; since a God who does not command respect, who is not feared, is forgot- ten. But this was the whole objective of the plan. The plan was simple: sow a false piety of comprehension to- wards non catholics, make ap- proaches to non catholics, open the doors of the Church to those who are not Catholics, remove things “of no importance” which might upset them, remove the sense of mystery in the adoration of God and of Christ, in love for Mary Most Holy, and in ev- erything that bears the title ‘Catholic’. In the masonic plan to destroy the Church, they were to begin with lit- tle, simpler, things. It is a plan which took years, working with constancy and, above all, securing the collabo- ration of Bishops, Priests and good Catholics. Always in the name of ‘love’, of ‘charity’. Though this word ‘charity’ is superfluous as well, be- cause, certainly, it speaks of neigh- bour, but it is linked to love for God, for Christ and love for the Virgin and the Saints. So they preferred the word ‘love’, for they say that it is the same, and besides, love is more mod- ern, more intelligible to the people and can unite everyone closer to- gether. Note the incalculable and de- finitive transcendence of this plan, quite simply diabolical, which led to the dethronement of Christ and the destruction of Christ’s Church, be- cause love for neighbour cannot exist without the essential foundation of love for God, as the infiltrators well knew. For the word ‘piety’ they substi- tuted ‘understanding’, which meant the same regarding others, the brethren, but which did not include the meaning of union with God, with Christ, with the Virgin, and so forth. They said that ‘piety’ sounds of affec- tation, of beatas with nothing to do but go to church to pass the time. The old Catholic hymnals disappeared; they brought in protestant and pro- fane hymns, saying that traditional hymns were too ‘sentimental’. Their plan consisted quite simply in imposing love and adoration of man and eliminating love and adoration of God. This is how they reasoned: ‘once love for God has disappeared, men cannot love each other, rather they will hate each other’. Thus their objective consisted in modify- ing the first and greatest Command- ment of God’s Law, which says “You shall love the Lord your God with your whole heart, and with your whole soul, and with your whole understanding, and with your whole strength.” The plan was highly attractive, because every- thing was to be done in the name of a great cause: ‘love for neighbour’. And with this catch phrase, they were readily able to win the sincere collaboration of good Catholics, of Priests and of Bishops, in going about putting an end to the Love of God, to the Love which is the fount of all love, and in nothing other than in the name of ‘love’. In the name of love, they went about sow- ing hatred for the essential: Love of God. First of all the plan consisted in taking external things away from the people, saying that they were “of no importance”, that they of- fended the sensibilities of their “separated brethren”, the non catholics. Besides their attack on habits, there was also a plan to have people set aside their medals, scapulars, rosaries, etc. The plan held all of this to be “highly important”, since these things which seemed to have no im- portance were those which breathed love for God, for Christ, and for the Virgin… Who had to be dethroned from society. As for the scapular and the medal, it was easy, the infiltrated said: insist on them being things of beatas, external things, things “of no importance”, but which offended the ideas of their protestant “brethren”; so that it would be better to set them aside, not to use them, and thus it would be eas- ier for protestants to approach the Church. More than thirty Popes have rec- ommended the scapular of Mount Carmel, have used it, have propa- gated it with the most beautiful words that human vocabulary allows. Hundreds of thousands of Priests and Bishops have ardently recom- mended it for seven centuries and millions of Catholics have worn it. And suddenly, no one speaks of it; someone goes to a church to get a scapular and there are none, nor do they bother to make them. As though by magic, there are no scapulars, as though they were useless, as though they had to do with beatos. The infil- trators really seem to have had suc- cess with the scapular. And yet the scapular continues to be Our Mother’s basic weapon, the loving tenderness of the Virgin towards Her children. Away with Soutanes and Habits! let Priests and Nuns leave aside their habits and the like. All these external things “of no importance”, were a tes- timony to lives spent constantly close to God, to Christ, to the Virgin… and they were the first to be taken away, because those habits bore witness to lives consecrated to God. Every nun’s habit on the streets was a cry from a life given up for the love of God, a silent cry, but constant, that God and His Church exist in our century, from hundreds of thousands of people ready to sacrifice their one life for love of Christ. Freemasonry had planned well and felt proud at having used nothing less than vatican coun- cil II to carry this out. The plan was to begin by saying that habits are an- tiquated; in the second place, to spread the idea that dressed as lay people, Priests and Nuns could find their way into circles in which the habit would be a barrier separating the protestant “brethren” from Catholics. There can be no doubt of their great success, for neither Nuns nor Priests were to be seen any more on the streets or anywhere else. That was the first part of the plan; the final part was to have them truly to cease to exist, that people might forget the figure of the Priest or the Nun; and not seeing them, youth would be ig- norant of their existence and thus it would never occur to anyone to think of becoming a Priest or a Nun. The figure of the man who sacrifices his whole life for Christ would cease to exist. It is interesting to see what kind of people have been used in this plan, for it is boldness of the sub- tlest kind: it has made use of good Catholics, Priests, Nuns, Bishops… to destroy the priesthood… but we will look into this later in more de- tail. The plan was also to remove Nuns from their cloisters. Insinuate that their “brethren” in the street needed them, that a Carmelite can do much good attending the sick and running schools, and so on. The plan appears really stupendous, captivating the most intelligent. Who could remain unmoved at an urgent call to love of neighbour, to attend those who suffer, who weep, who are in need, if it is Christ Him- self who suffers and weeps when our “brother” suffers and weeps? In this they had great success. Many cloisters ceased to be clois- ters. Those bastions of love for God ceased to exist. Freemasonry wanted to destroy them completely, as it knows very well that they were blazing furnaces of love for God and for His Most Holy Mother! Because it knows very well that those souls buried alive for Christ were the fire which stoked Chris- tendom. Out on the streets, those impregnable fortresses disap- peared; on dressing as lay people they realized that they could “love” their “brethren” better by not being a Nun. The plan led up to placing man on God’s pedestal and have people imagine that man is god; if God does not exist, there is no need to adore Him, there is no need to sacrifice one’s whole life for God, but for man, who is the new god. Enclosed convents were invinci- ble castles of love for God, and their destruction was essential for im- planting the first commandment as “love” for neighbour, forgetting love for God. Every Priest or Nun with their cassock or habit, on a walk through the city, was a cry of Next >